<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This weeks&#8217; model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecourtsofchaos.com/2007/05/25/this-weeks-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecourtsofchaos.com/2007/05/25/this-weeks-model/</link>
	<description>the random thoughts of robin harrison</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bell</title>
		<link>http://thecourtsofchaos.com/2007/05/25/this-weeks-model/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 12:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecourtsofchaos.com/2007/05/25/this-weeks-model/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Hi Robin, Sounds like you're having some fun there and doing some cool stuff. Depending upon runtime performance requirements, remember that you can implement model interpretation as well as or instead of model compilation if you want to cut down on the compile cycle (you could even create an approach like the one I use internally where you have the option of either generating or interpreting your models and can change depending on whether you want to test or deploy to production). Think base classes and you'll probably figure it out, but if you want, I'll give you a peek under the hood of how we're doing this stuff at Scotch just in case any of the ideas will be of use down the line.

Always good to see more people playing with code gen. If you can, mark the Code Generation conference in June next year in your calendar - I think you'd really enjoy some of the ideas there!

See ya at Scotch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robin, Sounds like you&#8217;re having some fun there and doing some cool stuff. Depending upon runtime performance requirements, remember that you can implement model interpretation as well as or instead of model compilation if you want to cut down on the compile cycle (you could even create an approach like the one I use internally where you have the option of either generating or interpreting your models and can change depending on whether you want to test or deploy to production). Think base classes and you&#8217;ll probably figure it out, but if you want, I&#8217;ll give you a peek under the hood of how we&#8217;re doing this stuff at Scotch just in case any of the ideas will be of use down the line.</p>
<p>Always good to see more people playing with code gen. If you can, mark the Code Generation conference in June next year in your calendar - I think you&#8217;d really enjoy some of the ideas there!</p>
<p>See ya at Scotch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.425 seconds -->
